Reckoning, Restoration, and Inauguration?

This week, my group finished curating and presented our final display. Unlike past weeks, much of the work we did was outside of the archives; last weekend, we each wrote case summaries and call-out labels, and on Monday we presented everything to the class. Perhaps more than anything else, my group spent the majority of the past week thinking about our case summary. Although we had a general idea of what we wanted to say, I think we all found it fairly difficult to actually say (in a clear and succinct manner). Beyond our case summary, we also spent a fair amount of time thinking about our classmates’ presentations. Although our work is done, part of me wishes that we had more time to talk to/collaborate with the other groups, particularly since they did many things that I found surprising and clever (e.g., I thought “Student Life” had a great layout; Women at Kenyon also had a very thoughtful narrative).

In terms of this week’s reading, one thing that I found interesting was Yazdiha’s discussion of reckoning and restoration in Chapter 6. In the chapter, Yazdiha analyzes invocations of the civil rights movement in the #MeToo movement, such as Oprah’s talking about Recy Taylor at the Golden Globe Awards. In addition to describing the relationship between power and memory (such as she did when talking about the racial boundaries of memory in Chapter 5), Yazidha focuses in on how some historically less powerful groups (e.g., women, black women) have done memory work in order to heal, set the record straight, and move forward. Such work is exemplified by those who participated in the #MeToo movement, as well as those who did similar things before the movement (e.g., Carmita Wood). Sadly, some of the stories included in this chapter demonstrate just how pernicious power/positionality is to memory (here I’m thinking of Anita Hill and Recy Taylor). Although someone might hold/posit a truthful memory, the likelihood of their memory being considered truthful by others may very well hinge on who they are (or what they look like).

Although I didn’t work on “Women at Kenyon”, I do think the work that my classmates did on this exhibit likely involved thinking about “reckoning and restoration” (Yazdiha 2023:162). Indeed, I also suspect that the folks who worked on the “50 Years of Women at Kenyon” celebration also wrestled with the same kinds of questions/problems (e.g., how has history obscured the lives of women at Kenyon? How might one highlight the lives of women of color at Kenyon?). As we move into this week, I’m interested to see if these discussions will continue on campus, given the impending inauguration of President Kornfeld. I wonder if her presidency will galvanize some folks to further celebrate/remember the lives of women at Kenyon. I also wonder what memories/groups will be pushed to the periphery during her presidency (if any will).


References


Yazdiha, Hajar. 2023. The Struggle for the People’s King: How Politics Transforms the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement. Princeton: Princeton University Press

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Junzo Shono: How We Remember Gambier

Archival and Canon Memory: Understanding Our Present Through Our Past

Hope, Suffering, and The Kenyon College Campus Guide